Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use ATmega32U4 or ATmega16U2 #10

Open
charlespax opened this issue Sep 16, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Use ATmega32U4 or ATmega16U2 #10

charlespax opened this issue Sep 16, 2014 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@charlespax
Copy link
Member

Considerations

  • The T400 uses the 32u4. Greater volume means greater discount
  • The 32u4 is fairly expensive compared to the ATmega328
  • The 32u4 sometimes has supply issues.
@charlespax
Copy link
Member Author

Let's use the cheapest microcontroller that gets the job done.

@charlespax charlespax changed the title Use ATmega32U4 Use ATmega32U4 of ATmega16U2 Jan 4, 2015
@charlespax charlespax added this to the Electronics version :-) milestone Jan 4, 2015
@charlespax
Copy link
Member Author

This is a pin-in-the-sky idea that is still viable. Reopening and moving to milestone Moving to milestone Electronics version :-)

@charlespax charlespax reopened this Jan 4, 2015
@charlespax charlespax changed the title Use ATmega32U4 of ATmega16U2 Use ATmega32U4 or ATmega16U2 Jan 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant