WebAuthn largeBlob extension #398
Replies: 3 comments
-
Some more information about implementation from mozilla: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
So extensions have never been incompatible with SimpleWebAuthn, but they definitely require the RP to know about them and how to serialize them. Not exactly simple. The problem with adding support for One possibility that came to mind is that I can expose @simplewebauthn/browser's base64url <> bytes helper methods. I can see this making it easier for RP's using an extension like |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey @MasterKale, thank you for the evaluation. I'm currently getting myself into the topic and certainly don't have that much experience yet regarding Webauthn externsions. I'll try to implement a cert storing use case in the future. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Heyho,
so with IOS 17 around the corner, there will be support for the largeBlob extension for WebAuthn.
https://webkit.org/blog/14205/news-from-wwdc23-webkit-features-in-safari-17-beta/
https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn-2/#sctn-large-blob-extension
I was wondering if this is a desired feature for this package, because I would love to see the implementation, considering the possible use cases. For example, storing private keys.
Looking forward for your thoughts on this topic.
Cheers,
Lukas
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions