You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am running into an issue with this library: the code is running to completion without any up errors and outputting the three files (frame_all.mat, reg.mat, and processed.mat). However, when I take a look at the identified contours, they don't match on to any neurones; it almost seems to be that the programme is selecting the ROIs at random.
I have tried tweaking the available parameters, particularly se to no avail; with any iteration, the code runs to completion but outputs the wrong contours. Are there any other parameters, whether high- or low-level, that I should change to receive better contours?
I understand that this is a localised issue and will most likely require that I share the files I am analysing and I am happy to do that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am running into an issue with this library: the code is running to completion without any up errors and outputting the three files (
frame_all.mat
,reg.mat
, andprocessed.mat
). However, when I take a look at the identified contours, they don't match on to any neurones; it almost seems to be that the programme is selecting the ROIs at random.I have tried tweaking the available parameters, particularly
se
to no avail; with any iteration, the code runs to completion but outputs the wrong contours. Are there any other parameters, whether high- or low-level, that I should change to receive better contours?I understand that this is a localised issue and will most likely require that I share the files I am analysing and I am happy to do that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: