Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Large drift when using IMU only #17

Open
antithing opened this issue Jul 4, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Large drift when using IMU only #17

antithing opened this issue Jul 4, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@antithing
Copy link

antithing commented Jul 4, 2023

Hi,

I have the code running well on a D455, but I notice that when visual tracking is lost, the pose will drift quickly away from truth.

For example if the camera is static, and I block the cameras, the pose immediately drifts fast away.

Is there a way to improve the IMU-only tracking so that it stays reasonably accurate when visual points are lost?

Thanks!

@pattylo
Copy link
Member

pattylo commented Aug 24, 2023

Hi I think for VIO software, when feature points tracking fails severely, it creates drastic drift; which in our opinion, it's totally normal.
Personally, I don't think there is a very robust way to provide very robust IMU-only tracking, as it is well-known that IMU integration is prone to drift eventually due to its natural characteristic, i.e., sensitive to noise as well as high frequency integration. I hope the above resolve some of your concern. Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants